@Cw122
I'm meaning we as in community provision that's been traditionally female only such as domestic violence charities, homeless shelters etc.
Female bodied people in those places are even more vulnerable than women in public toilets for example.
That is why single sex (not single gender identity) provisions exist for female bodied people and male bodied people.
So why should female bodied be made less safe in order to not hurt the feelings of male bodied people?
And if your argument is that it's not about feelings, it's about the physical safety of trans women (male bodied people) then that reinforces the necessity of single sex spaces for female bodied people.
Women had to fight for female only single sex spaces, despite coming up against patriarchal resistance. They had to fight long and hard to secure female only single spaces.
Why do TRAs not think they should fight long and hard for spaces that are safe for them? Why do they believe women should make space in their single sex spaces to the detriment of their safety and comfort, instead of asking men to make space in theirs and treat trans women with respect?
The answer i suspect is in truth because TRAs see changing male behaviour as more difficult and challenging than changing female behaviour.
But that's why they should campaign for third spaces or safe spaces in male single sex spaces.
It wasn't easy for women either. It wasn't quick. It wasn't widely accepted by society to start with.
And that's not me making it a race to the bottom. It's making it fair and not allowing male bodied people to benefit from the tough, decades long, ongoing work women do to make themselves physically safer through single sex spaces which were specifically fought for in order to remove the presence of male bodied people from said spaces.