The your whole spiel about people with quadriplegia was bizarre. Because its a physical condition not a mental condition and therefore there is no reason to suppose people with the condition do not understand consent and therefore need to be medicated.
My ‘spiel’ about quadriplegia was an example of someone who could mentally want sex because they have the urges but have something stopping them from doing it. Which is what the article is about.
Then having a chemical castration which temporarily suppresses hormones would remove those urges.
A parent in that situation may decide that instead of getting a prostitute which would take the urge away for a few days, that the hormone suppressants would be a much better option.
So to repeat my opinion - that if the only way you can have sex is by raping or paying for it, then you shouldn’t be having sex.
And if you do not understand the other person needs to consent, then you shouldn’t be having sex.
You don’t need to agree with my opinion but please don’t try and make out I’m being discriminatory when I’m not.