A little harsh!
Choosing green alternatives is an economic issue and people need to be able to afford to do these things, it isn't always that straightforward.
Public transport in many localities has been cut so that for some it's no longer an option for getting to work and they have to have a car, which may mean they have to use it for more than 3000m pa.
Refillable options for consumables is also location dependent -theyre not widely available. Chain stores are only beginning to trial them in certain areas and zero waste shops still don't exist in every settlement.
Not to mention, your judgement overlooks those with health issues or disabilities (hidden or visible) for whom public transport can be too exhausting and painful. Or those who are physically unable to do the literal legwork involved in buying as much of their produce as they can from small businesses and markets who do offer refillable options.
Electric cars are expensive, until they filter down the secondhand market most people are still unable to afford them. Electric cars aren't really the answer either, they're a money spinner.
The onus on fixing climate change is with the very rich, governments and huge corporations. Ordinary people can apply pressure through voting and ethical consumptive choices wherever possible.
So, although I understand where the op is coming from - and they have highlighted the moral issue ordinary people will be facing this winter - everyone must do their best to continue to do their bit in order to keep pressure on governments, stop them ducking responsibility, encourage businesses to see the value in offering green options, etc.