Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think there should be a point at which they trust my judgement?

257 replies

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 13:23

Genuinely, asking this question. I'm a bit confused and not sure if I've really messed up. I don't want to drip feed but equally don't want an essay so I'll try to give the important information and happy to clarify if necessary.

Starting 5 years ago my 2 DC (15 & 10) have been under Children's services Child in Need. This happened as I had a mental breakdown. The case was closed about 6 months ago. Due to abuse in my childhood from my dad one of the stipulations was that they couldn't be alone with my parents. My parents live in a different country and due to Covid we've not seen them much over the past 2 years. My mum is keen to get to know her grandchildren better. We arranged that today my mum would pick up my DD from school (in her car with air con) and take her to the cinema (more air con.) I thought as the case had been closed and my mental health is much better (in terms of me being able to make a judgement) that this would be ok. But I've just found out Children's Services are opening their case again due to this. What do you think? I love my mum and want her to see her grandchildren, but maybe we should have planned for me to go along?

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:33

Really? That's interesting. I'm not sure I can, though. When I think about things I just completely shut down 😔 I also have Emotionally Unstable PD.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:36

midairchallenger · 19/07/2022 14:50

Well, you had previously been giving the appearance of better judgement? How were they to predict you would suddenly think this a good idea after previously accepting it should be avoided?

So they did trust your judgement until you gave them pause with this decision. They haven't intervened because of general distrust, they have intervened in response to a specific decision. Surely you can see the difference?

If I sent my kids off to play on the motorway, do you think I should be able to dismiss concerns with "you should trust my judgement" ?

It's not the same thing atall. Anyway turns out my judgement was ok as the duty SW just wanted to make sure my DD wouldn't have unsupervised contact with my dad. Turns out it is ok for my mum to collect her from school.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:39

averythinline · 19/07/2022 14:53

Whats to stop your mum taking dc to your dad ...if shes in the car with them for example?

You still dont seem to see your mum as complicit in the abuse of you.... have you ever discussed it with her and why the dc were CIN?

I think you should definitely pursue the therapy for you with your gp...it can be really hard to deal with all that trauma without help...

Grandparents dont always deserve a relationship with dc .....

Because she knows it is against my wishes. I haven't really discussed it with her no. I mean obviously I told her when they couldn't be alone with the DC. It is something I find really hard to talk about.

OP posts:
viques · 19/07/2022 16:40

Why are you emphasising the air con? I doubt SS are that bothered that child abusing grandparents are being careful their grandchildren don’t overheat. I imagine that they are slightly more concerned about your lack of judgement in allowing them access to the children.

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:44

Youaremysunshine14 · 19/07/2022 14:54

You keep saying it wasn't considered abuse back then, as though that somehow lessens it. Just because the terminology wasn't in place then doesn't mean the abuse wasn't serious. Was your mum aware it was happening? That for me is key. If she didn't and only found out a while afterwards, I might be inclined to consider a relationship, although the fact she's stayed with your dad is awful given that she now knows what he did. If she did know, why on earth would you want a relationship with someone who stood by and did nothing and could easily do the same if your dad ever engineered it so he'd see your DC too.

Yes, that makes sense. I have lots of mixed feelings about the whole situation. I don't know if my mum knows. Like she still doesn't know, perhaps. My dad does still see them when I'm there. I know he would never touch them but he doesn't get the chance all the same. CS are now saying that it is ok for my DC to be with him if my mum is there but I wouldn't do that anyway. The thing is they already have a relationship with their grandparents. It's not like I'm considering whether they should have a relationship - they already do.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:45

averythinline · 19/07/2022 14:53

Whats to stop your mum taking dc to your dad ...if shes in the car with them for example?

You still dont seem to see your mum as complicit in the abuse of you.... have you ever discussed it with her and why the dc were CIN?

I think you should definitely pursue the therapy for you with your gp...it can be really hard to deal with all that trauma without help...

Grandparents dont always deserve a relationship with dc .....

Re:therapy - I have been pursuing it for years. Way beyond GP stage. I thought I was finally going to get long term therapy and they gave me 4 months.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:48

nca · 19/07/2022 15:01

Oh love you need therapy to untangle all of this. I hope you can access some soon. Good luck.

I know...I'm seeing a therapist now - we have 4 months to do Schema (should be more like 2 years). I'm just starting to trust her - we've only got 6 weeks left so will only be touching on the superficial stuff.

OP posts:
TheSoapyFrog · 19/07/2022 16:48

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 14:46

I was never told to end the relationship with either parent.

I was giving an example OP. In your case the recommendation was to not allow your parents to be alone with your child. Allowing your parents to be alone with your kids is the same as going back to an abusive partner.

It still puts your children at risk. If you had continued to allow them to be alone with their grandparents while you were on child in need despite the recommendation, you probably would have gone on a child protection plan. Your children aren't suddenly not at risk anymore.

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:52

AffIt · 19/07/2022 15:00

With respect, your judgement is off, and that is absolutely NOTHING against you, OP, because we are conditioned to believe that what we grew up with is/was 'normal' and conditioning is incredibly difficult to shake off.

However, the fact is that you were abused to such an extent in your childhood that it has seriously affected your mental health to the extent that Social Services has stepped in: that's pretty fucking serious.

PPs have mentioned that your mother is an enabler due to staying with a known child abuser: I won't comment further on this other than to say that the cycle of abuse is well-known, and people who may well have suffered from abuse themselves are not always the best advocates of others.

I think you need to very careful to adhere to SS's conditions to the literal letter, tenuous though it may seem. Your relationship with your children is more important than any relationship with their grandparents.

I do really appreciate your honesty. In my head it's either her no big deal or I just have sensations of being scared but I don't really know what happened. I'm not sure of the ins and outs with my mum but I will say she has had a lot of trauma in her life. And yes, absolutely my relationship with my DC is my priority.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:53

SkySmiler · 19/07/2022 15:04

Why did the school tell you they would be going on the CIN plan again? It's not upto them.

I know it's not up to them. It was after talking to the manager of the team my DC are under.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:54

FayeGovan · 19/07/2022 15:05

It sounds like you are in denial about your mums part in this. And rightly the authorities recognise that denial and are trying to safeguard your children.

Maybe I am.

OP posts:
FayeGovan · 19/07/2022 16:54

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:29

I don't think my mum knows, tbh. I do believe that they are safe with her. She has accepted not seeing them alone over the last 5 years and has accepted it today. She wouldn't 'just pop in and see grandpa'.

You weren't safe with your mum @UndertheCedartree .

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:55

Spohn · 19/07/2022 15:07

(I am a victim of CSA)
You allowed your abuser access to your kids, and still would like him to access them. You want his enabler, his pro child abuse/pro paedophile wife to continue to access your kids too. This is so far beyond the realms of being in any way ok, it’s genuinely horrifying. You need urgent help with your judgement.

Safeguard your kids from child abusers.

I've said nothing about CSA. I'm sorry for what you have suffered but you are projecting.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 19/07/2022 16:56

I have a father that can’t be trusted with my dc, I know how hard it is to walk away from the dream of a loving extended family and support, but you absolutely must op.

The children’s relationship with you is paramount, absolutely paramount. Their relationship with grandparents is optional and secondary.

Given the choice, do you think they would want their stability and safety compromised for a few fleeting visits with either of your parents?
Of course not.

You are still in denial about what has happened to you (SS would never make stipulations like that without a very good reason) and because you can’t face up to the truth - understandably - you are endangering or could endanger your children, you are compromising your position as their main care provider and potentially putting them at risk again with your father.

Your mother is still with your abuser, still enabling him which is why she can never ever be trusted.SHE will always put him first over and above you, over and above your children’s safety and well being. That will never change ir she would have left him by now.

You can continue to see her if you want to, but keep your children away please, for their own good. It’s better to have no gps at all than ones that endanger them in any way.

And no, he will never change. Ever.
No your mother will never change either

Your best bet is to find safer forms of support from TODAY and show SS your progress and safe decision making. Vow not to let either parent near them again.

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:57

FayeGovan · 19/07/2022 15:09

Also, how can you bare the thought your dad might, just might get access to your kids through your mum? Your mum probably lied to you saying she knew nothing, yet you trust her on this.
The thought of it makes my toes curl.

No, my mum hasn't lied to me. CS are ok with my dad having supervised contact. The risk is pretty low as far as I can see. He would never lay a finger on them. My mum has no reason to go behind my back.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:58

ChateauMargaux · 19/07/2022 15:10

Your mother does not need to be alone with your daughter to build a relationship with her. School and social services believe that your children should not be with your parents without supervision. Go with your mother to pick your child up from school and go with them to the cinema. Even though the social worker said it is OK for your Mum to be alone with your daughter, if you do this, you will invite more scrutiny and put your children through more scrutiny. You have already said that your son does not like this - you have the power to stop this now.

That is what I've done.

OP posts:
UnimpeachableBravery · 19/07/2022 16:59

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 16:57

No, my mum hasn't lied to me. CS are ok with my dad having supervised contact. The risk is pretty low as far as I can see. He would never lay a finger on them. My mum has no reason to go behind my back.

How could you possibly know he wouldn't lay a finger on them if he did it to you?

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 17:00

Spohn · 19/07/2022 15:11

Thanks for the pedantry 🙄
the couple are still child abusers. HTH

It's not the same and you made specific reference to CSA. My mum is not a child abuser.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 17:01

rocksonrocks · 19/07/2022 15:12

This with bells on. I think you've made a poor judgement here OP. What a shame for your children who were beginning to turn a corner in life. I'm sorry if that's harsh but it's true.

What do you mean they were beginning to turn a corner? How would you know anything about that. Also why is my mum picking my DD up stopping them turning a corner anyway??

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 19/07/2022 17:02

Op, if what your father did was so normal and minimal at the time why do you think you are struggling so much to face up to it?

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 17:03

Octomore · 19/07/2022 15:17

Your mum enables your abuse by your dad. Why on earth would you trust her not to enable him to abuse your children?

Your judgement on this is way off, sorry. You are allowing unsupervised contact with a woman who has a track record of enabling child abuse.

I am always with them if they see my dad.

OP posts:
UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 17:05

rocksonrocks · 19/07/2022 15:18

It wasn't considered abuse back then.

Also this is bullshit. You need more help than you realise if you can't understand why it's bullshit. A ruler to the knuckles or a slipper to the backside was considered discipline "back then" and would be abuse nowadays, but would certainly not warrant a prevention order being in place for YOUR children. I'm sorry that happened to you.

I do need help I agree. Getting it is another matter. I suppose it seemed normal to me. Also my brother is in even more denial than it seems I am.

OP posts:
Provenceinthesummer · 19/07/2022 17:06

You are compromising your children's safety and security by seeing your parents with your children at all.

Are you still being supported by your MH team? I think this is time to get more support before SS decide they can’t guarantee your children’s safety any longer.

UndertheCedartree · 19/07/2022 17:07

FetchezLaVache · 19/07/2022 15:19

I don't understand why school reported to CS the fact that your DD was going to be alone with your mum if, as you claim, they were not under instructions to do so.

They report any concerns, it comes under safeguarding. Poor little DD was questioned about it twice with different members of staff and then I turned up anyway.

OP posts:
rocksonrocks · 19/07/2022 17:10

What do you mean they were beginning to turn a corner? How would you know anything about that. Also why is my mum picking my DD up stopping them turning a corner anyway??

I mean in the sense that Child in Need order for your children was closed and they (and you) were able to move forward as a family without intervention from CS, but now because of this incident it will be reopened or looked into again and CS may need nice again be involved. You yourself said your DS hates talking to social workers etc. Its a shame.

Swipe left for the next trending thread