@IrishNinja There are essentially no nations that have invested smartly in energy infrastructure outside of a few outlier cases like Norway with its hydro for a population totalling half of Greater London. The entire planet is still run on 85% fossil fuels, and all the good deposits are used up now. That basically means we either pay more (a LOT more) for getting at the crud left behind, or we accept degrowth of the economy as the pie shrinks.
That shrinking pie will naturally make the share that the fat cats take right now in the elite rarified atmospheres of the Masters of the Universe segment of society a great deal more scrutinised. I foresee guillotines.
Drax is cancelling the mothballing of two coal plants because of the need for energy at all cost to keep the lights on. In less than 12 months, we've gone from the heady days of COP26 where Boris Johnson proclaimed we'd moved to save the world, to basically everyone scrambling for more of the dirtiest fossil fuels about. I guess climate change can wait while we get on with burning the furniture. Look at Germany. They invested solely in either Russian gas or wind and solar. Solar in Germany is the dumbest thing, and their wind, like ours, is subject to the whims of the atmosphere. That leaves Russian gas, and... oh dear.
It's rare to say it, but I'm so glad I don't live in Germany right now.
My screen name is actually a German ecologist's, the one who gave rise to the concept of Liebig's law of minimum, which states that the resource most limited is what holds things back like a weakest link. For Germany right now, that'd be gas, despite everything else they have going for them.
Sadly, our entire civ has been built on the assumption this state of affairs carries on indefinitely and without interruption, much like Just In Time manufacture (which we all horribly butchered from Toyota's original protocols to make industries that have zero resilience).
Interesting times ahead, my friends.