Come on @DomPerignon12 you don’t need to twist my words - if you’re reading your own thread properly you’ll know how clear I’ve been that marriage & wedding customs are borne out of patriarchal practises & are outdated today.
You just don’t want to own up to your hypocritical & contradictory arguments.
You’ve tried to maintain that your “shock” that his sisters will be having their wedding paid for but not your DP, is purely down to the sexist nature of it all. The horror.
When I’ve pointed out that the majority of the ritual of marriage you’re even going to be carrying out is rooted in sexism you don’t want to comment.
So it’s ok for you to cherry pick the nice traditional (& sexist) bits you want to keep in like maybe bridesmaids?? Wearing a veil?? being given you away?? carried over the threshold?? (there are many more) but his parents aren’t allowed to do their traditional (& sexist) bit & pay for their daughters - whilst ALSO GIVING you & your DP a financial contribution!!
Hypocritical much?
And even when I’ve pointed out the irony of your argument & said that surely his parents being (as you say, generous & really lovely people) wanting to follow this tradition (as you yourself will be doing in other ways) is a far lesser evil than the reasons you say you are more accustomed to hearing about such as having golden child family dynamics, out & out favouritism & rewarding going on, for the perfect child.
I know which of these scenarios would be more toxic to marry into. They should be causing you to “wobble” far more than what is actually going to happen ie his parents will be giving you a financial contribution to your wedding. How awful of them.
So surely you should be telling your DP to take comfort in the fact that his DP’s love him just as much as his DS’s & are merely following (yes s sexist) tradition.
And in the traditional scheme of things it wasn’t “unfair” then, because the eldest son (ie presumably your DP) would inherit the family land & property. (Again sexist but a custom - which for all you know they may wish to continue).
Will you then be posting to say how unreasonable it is that you’re inheriting a fortune? But are being unreasonable to be annoyed that it came from a sexist tradition?
Again as others have said, why will you be deliberately inviting less of their guests than you were planning to, now that you know that they won’t be be paying the same as they would be for their daughters?
Oh I see you’re not punishing them because you’re financially getting less, you’re punishing them for their crime of sexism.
Right. With you.