How do they they think this is helping?
like a pp just said, this is overload for the jury.
JDs team wove a clear narrative, pulling out key points for the jury’s attention, pauses for reflection, re-showing or playing evidence but not commenting too much on it but letting it speak for itself.
This is jumbled, fast almost garbled, all over the place, like someone else said like they are trying to make up for lost time of the jury, misrepresenting evidence and testimony, she’s even giving her OWN opinions on peoples testimony - is she an expert witness too now?!