[quote Emmelina]I’ve not RTFT, because it’s several pages long and 1am.
But - where did you get the idea they’re sitting naked talking to 5 year olds? Their website shows their school programme is for KS3 upwards and clearly breaks down what is taught when here: schoolofsexed.org/programme[/quote]
@Emmelina
Age appropiate content.
If you were paid to stand on a stage to
• talk for 60 min about sex or
• act out a sex act or
• stripping naked and act for 5 min
would you do this in front of a 5 year old you did not know?
Would you stop and think a 5 year old's educational level of sex acts should be based around you are a child to nobody touches you and you don't them (in a sexual way)?
That other sex issues consent, pleasure, masturbation etc need to be approched very differently when you are talking to a 5 year old rather than a 15 year old?
That unlike a 15 year old telling a 5 year old details of the act of sexual reproduction is unnecessary, rather you will have a sister/brother usually covers how babies are made? Then let the 5 year old lead the conversation?
That 5 year olds should not be subjected to any sex acts, and that these are covered under no sexual contact?
After working your way down the governments guidence do you still have a 60 min show suitable for a 5 year old to learn about consent?
Its called reputational risk.
Eg. I will be very suprised if the nspcc don't issue a takedown notice of any of their branding.
The staff may be competent, professional, and well trained to deliver training. But this is not guilt by association this is a claim that the team members are active participants within the creation of the show.
When an organisation decides to lend their name and reputation to an event, they carry the consequences if things dont work out the way it was planned. That's why professional oversight is needed.
So were they involved in advertising for actors over twitter?
Note the advert tweet as written breached the legal standards and showed that they were going to be actively discriminating in their recruitment process.
If the organisation you are working with can't get the basics of how to hire right, how much trust do you place on the rest of their process?
If the staff involved in the theatre project did not say that clear different age appropiate modules are needed for a 5 year old and a 15 year old then that's a red flag. If staff failed to bring that to management for review that's a red flag. If the staff did its very relevant to ask how their current management responded.
Particularly as it looks as if all of the old directors in the LTD resigned in 2020 with a 2 month gap for a couple of them.