@AwkwardPaws27
I am eating out tomorrow night, and for interest went and tallied up what I would normally order in this restaurant - 2,683 across two courses, a G&T and a coffee. With this info easily available, I will change my rib eye for a fillet and order a different side dish
I agree it should be available - but why not online or on a separate info sheet? Having it on the menu makes it unavoidable for people who have issues with restrictive eating.
It does have to be all or nothing - it's thinking about the delivery method of the information so people can choose whether to see it or not.
But that requires people to think/be motivated to look. If it's in front of me, personally, it will definitely help me make more conscious decisions in that moment when I'm looking at the menu. Sometimes they'll be good, sometimes they won't

, but it will definitely help me.
I also agree that there are some dishes that are not obviously very high calorie, even though I have a decent grasp on food generally.
I do think that the people who eat excessively in this country massively outweigh (pun intended) those with restrictive eating, so all in all I would think this is a positive move. I would also think it is likely to expand to list macro levels in the future too, but all in all will be interesting to see where it goes.
Was talking to my sister this weekend about how often we ate out as children. I reckon once a year might be an exaggeration ... very different world we live in now, eating out is so much more commonplace for many. It will do no harm if both diners and restaurants are persuaded to more healthy options - and by that, I do mean healthy, not just restricted calories by removing fat and adding sweeteners.