I confess to not having RTFT but I have been through the website. It's covered in 🚩- or should be. The terms highlighted by @Throughabushbackwards go directly against the statutory safeguarding safeguarding guidance. In that guidance, sexual abuse is defined:
"Involves forcing or enticing a child or young person to take part in sexual activities, not necessarily involving a high level of violence, whether or not the child is aware of what is happening. The activities may involve physical contact, including assault by penetration (for example, rape or oral sex) or non-penetrative acts such as masturbation, kissing, rubbing and touching outside of clothing. They may also include non-contact activities, such as involving children in looking at, or in the production of, sexual images, watching sexual activities, encouraging children to behave in sexually inappropriate ways, or grooming a child in preparation for abuse. Sexual abuse can take place online, and technology can be used to facilitate offline abuse. Sexual abuse is not solely perpetrated by adult males. Women can also commit acts of sexual abuse, as can other children."
The people running the show seem to say that "boundaries" is defined as:
"The limits we set for ourselves and other people, which indicate what we find comfortable and uncomfortable"
This is wrong, wrong, wrong.
Politicians need to wake the fuck up. Handwringing over bekiiind and ignoring "difficult" issues is what's got us here.