The thing is, a terrible thing happened and we know that.
We don't know his intentions when he picked her up and put her in his van.
Was it like a parent grabbing their toddler and carting them off when they insist on jumping in puddles (obviously she's an adult and it's totally inappropriate)- misguided, controlling, but not malicious.
A stranger grabbing a woman and carting her off is clearly intending harm- murder, rape, whatever.
A boyfriend may have intended to finish their argument, prove he was right, get her home where they can argue without her walking off.... all dickhead, controlling, absolutely unacceptable controlling behaviours.
But not indicative of intending to injure or physically abuse her.
We don't know that he grabbed her intending to carry her off, beat, rape etc.
The thing I can't forgive, and which to me suggests he should have a far higher sentence, is that he didn't stop or call emergency services or try to help her in any way.
That to me undermines any claim he may make that he didn't intend her harm.
Just to reiterate- I don't agree with the sentence, I'm just trying to understand how it could have been judged appropriate.