@BearOfEasttown
I get you
*@BellatrixOnABadDay* but I just think that taking on such a huge life commitment (as having a baby) at such a young age would not have been for me. As much as I love my kids and don't regret having them, it IS a massive commitment and completely changes your life. I would not change a thing if I could back to 30 years old, but I can't deny it's been hard work sometimes - AND your finances take a massive hit - for around 18 to 20 years!
I could never have imagined doing it in my early 20s/just out of my teens, and am glad I left it to my early 30s. Each to their own...
Agree there with the massively changing your life obviously 😁 I remember thinking 'oh god!' when we got home from hospital. I was definitely a bit shaky/going through the baby blues in the first few days, then had a lovely lovely community midwife visit, who told me everyone feels like that, and from then on I just settled down to it.
I can totally see why it wouldn't be for everyone in their 20s- I don't think it's comparable with having a baby in your teens though and don't think it should be considered similar in any way. Although I'm a firm believer in trying to make the best out of any situation in life and I don't think a baby at 16 has to be a disaster, even if it's not ideal. Flip the situation on its head, look at the good aspects, put in a lot of effort and it can still be an amazing life, for mum and baby.
I think it comes down to whether a baby is planned or not, and that can be the key to how easy/difficult it is- although obviously not always. I had thought about it and chose very much to have my children when I did. So for me, it was the right thing.
If I had to say an ideal I would say mid twenties to mid thirties is the ideal time for having babies- I'm 33 now and still class myself as young and feel young, and essentially don't think I've changed much since my mid 20s. Aspects of my character have changed because of what I went through with my ex, not particularly my age, I would say.