On a serious note, i am very boring MC but did not prioritise housing. I did prioritise education, travel and art. I am not like the rest of my ilk, and have always valued being a free spirit over money. Many people who share a similar background to me think i am a bit odd but seem to respect my choice not follow a prescription lifestyle. However, the only people who have ever remarked that this is 'weird' have been WC, who seem to find my values suspicious 
Not all MC value the same things or share the same beliefs.
However there are traits I have perceived as WC that tend to be more 'solid' and less flexible, which remind me of the rigidity of UC.
I don't make my ethical position public, it seems such an odd thing to do, sharing details of your income and spending habits online. Nor do i care for performative 'boasting' concerning values. It all seems a bit insecure and competitive. MN is teeming with this, but since it is the internet, no one really cares how you spend, postulate or compete with your peers. No one cares what you prioritise or whether or not you spend money on ski holidays, expensive weddings or horses.
How you spend does not define you as a person, it is a very mixed bag, part imitation, partly passed down and generally put into you via the culture you were born into. I find it disturbing that there is so much attention and fixation upon class insecurity and 'performative spending' (my values are superior to yours, etc) on MN.