@NdujaWannaDance, I am on the side of the prosecution if the footage of your hypothetical incident shows trampling. I'll check it carefully of course, just as I have checked the TikTok video.
I see someone being trampled on in the video. It's the young child. Are you seriously suggesting that this Guardsman managed to avoid contact between his foot and a child rolling underneath him on the pavement?
No I am not. I am saying that some level of contact between his foot and the child doesn't necessarily constitute the child being trampled. The definition of being trampled is to be crushed underfoot. He wasn't crushed and he barely went underfoot, if at all.
There was ample room on the right to step aside safely. Unlike your scenario, the Guardsman had a choice about where to walk if he wanted to avoid barreling into a young child.
There was ample room in both scenarios. There was a choice in both scenarios. One has been trained to resist the urge to jump away from anything in his path even if it would be the reflexive thing to do in normal circumstances.
The other made a choice that he felt served his interests best in the moment. He did not need to allow his feet to come into contact AT ALL with the policeman. He allowed them to in a split second decision because he didn't want to get caught by the policceman to his left.