I assume anyone against this move is also in favour of legalising (and taxing) all drugs? it’s not about being against it, it’s about being realistic.
IMO smoking is a vile habit and I would love for it to not exist.
But it’s a fact that we make a huge amount of tax from smoking, far more than costs the country in treating smoking-related illness. Where is that shortfall going to be made up from? Are people prepared to pay higher income taxes to make up the shortfall?
Also, this law proposes that it will be banned for under 14’s. Given many people live into their 80’s and 90’s smoking won’t be banned altogether until the 22nd century. Banning under 14’s isn’t going to make smoking less of a scourge, the smokers, most of who are over the age of 50 or so, are going to continue to be around for the next 50 years or so.
So in truth this is just a statement, “let’s ban cigarettes being sold to under 14’s, and eventually no-one will be able to buy them ever.” Except that by the time that “one day” arrives Arden and all her followers will be long dead.