@Helloise
You are literally DESPERATE to be offended. I've never seen anything like it.
You misunderstand. I am indeed DESPERATE…DESPERATE to ensure that female people - the ones with female bodies - continue to be recognised as a valid political and social group with the right to self assemble, self define, access single sex provisions and speak with a political voice about what female people need.
So if someone’s ideology tells them it is unacceptable for those things to exist then yes, I am offended. But it’s not because I want to be offended, it’s because someone asserting that my lived experience as a person of the female sex is insignificant compared to a male’s self image as a woman is fucking offensive!
I do acknowledge your existence as a person with a DSD. And as long as that overarching principle that female bodies people exist, are valid and have specific challenges that cannot be subsumed into mixed-sex gender identities or provisions is accepted, I have no issue if in the real world implementation of single sex provisions there be individual exceptions for DSDs as long as these are not simply self id, and not because of an aspect of the mind rather than the body.
And to be clear, I can say this precisely because, unlike genderism, my views are not an ideology with tenets of belief that must be followed, but a set of pragmatic principles based on the reality of what female people need to survive and thrive in a sexist society. They are not stone tablets that say “this is how you must live forever”, they are simply what we need to live right now.