If we wanted some balance and accuracy we could point out that if you had your kids in your teens, they are more likely to live in poverty, more likely to be in a single parent home, less likely to go to third level education, more likely to go to prison.....
I wouldn’t call that balance!
Balance would be pointing out the average age of a first time mum is 29.6, not lurching from one extreme to another.
As for implying only older parents can love their kids and put food on the table!! Not even going to waste my time with that one.
I think this is one of those topics where whatever age you became a mum, you will plant your flag firmly in its corresponding age bracket, and declare it to be the best one. It’s like when you get 16 year old mums saying it’s the best because they’ll spend more of their lives together, etc. It’s just them reassuring themselves.
If people were truly comfortable and confident in their decisions, they wouldn’t be so outraged when they are discussed. I had my child in my late 20s. A ‘teenage mum’ by the standards of some people, and quite old according to my granny! There are pros and cons, but I’m happy with my choice, so am quite happy to discuss it in an objective manner without being outraged.