I know someone right now who is stuck at work from 8.30am, to 7.30pm or even 8pm, 2 or 3 days a week, even though her official finish time is 5pm. They keep her working overtime with meetings and deadlines, and say she cannot be dedicated to the job if she wants to leave 'early.' (AKA on time!!!)
Isn't it interesting how it's HER fault for not being dedicated to a job that isn't actually technically hers (as it needs to be done outside her working hours), but never the company's faulty for not being dedicated to their employees' well-being....
9am start means arrive at 8am for me…. This is why there is pay disparity. I learnt it from a successfull woman.
It impacts work / life balance of course, but the financial reward is worth it.
That's great if it works for you, but the people who are affected by this are disproportionately those on the lowest wages. Not everybody wants a career or success: they just want to do their job well during the agreed (paid) hours and then go home and live their lives - there's nothing inferior about that choice.
As an employer, I write it in to the contract as “ on your first task at 8am”.
This is also explained verbally to employees, that it does not mean walking in the door at 8am.
So do you mean that you conscientiously and fairly set their contract and pay to include their necessary job-specific prep/set-up time - or do you just bully/exploit them into giving you free working time every day?
I’m a manager of a store and during our busiest periods, that’s late. I need my staff there at 5 to to be ready to serve.
No problem at all with that - I presume they're contracted and paid from 8:55, then? Interesting that they're expected five minutes early during busy times but still not allowed to be in five minutes late when it's quieter - very unfair and one-way.