Maybe they are in the ‘are being transferred’ category at the point the site was updated? No idea. They confirm all cases have or are being transferred every day.
So it is hardly a militant exercise if cases are transferred over the course of days, then. I believe in last year's August outbreak, Dr Bloomfield did acknowledge there were a couple of individuals who absolutely refused to go to MIQ and completed supervised isolation at home.
I believe the process typically involves a case being identified, health workers visiting the home and explaining the standard procedures. People either immediately agree and head off to MIQ or there is a negotiation process during which the benefits are explained and questions answered and the person/people in question are given space to adjust.
At this point almost everyone accepts 'all right, this is the best option'. In the case of someone completely opposed, they are not actually marched into MIQ under police guard (though might be unless the person isolating then proceeds to break the rules of self-isolation).
Most people when confronted with the reality of managing their Covid infection at home under strict supervision decide MIQ is not such a horrifying prospect after all. There has been a noted absence of post-MIQ Covid patients running to the media or getting on social media to complain that their human rights were abused by the process.
In the bigger picture, given that state, federal or government-mandated quarantine is within the legal framework of most countries around the world, what is your exact problem with the fact that NZ is using it right now? Most countries in this pandemic never even had the option of using it because a) the spread of the virus has been too wide to make it practical and b) they aren't running an elimination strategy. NZ's current elimination strategy is supported by the solid majority of the country and nobody who has been through Covid MIQ appears to be upset by the experience. So what actual 'human rights abuse' has occurred?