Wheres the common ground though? I asked upthread and I don’t think anyone answered yet, what overlap would you be happy with?
Everyone should be free to present how they want, change their name if they wish, be trans/gay/NB etc.
Feminists are concerned with women's rights.
The bottom line in preserving women's rights from a GC perspective is preserving the definition of the word "woman".
If you believe penis havers can be women then "women only" anything, all women's rights, become mixed sex and basically meaningless. Tra "the other side" disagree on that point, thinking being a woman is not related to having or not having a penis, and think it's all a matter for any individual to decide personally if they're a woman or not.
The middle ground is for everyone to recognise the need for single sex spaces, eg in sport, prisons refuges and public loos etc, that single sex spaces are important in order for women to participate in public life safely and fairly.
Trans people also need to participate in public life safely and fairly. We can all agree on that.
The solution is not to make life more unfair and unsafe for women. It's to come up with an alternative.
Many alternatives have been put forth by feminists only for the suggestions to be met with vile misogynistic abuse from TRA.
Any normal person would be onside with mixed sex spaces for trans people and all others who are happy with mixed sex spaces, whilst preserving same sex spaces for those who need them.
Sorry for the length. Someone else could probably explain it in one line...