@SpringTides5
In this case, the rising instructor could have offered an alternative pony to the parent's DD. That would have been the expectation of staff at both my DCs' private and state academy schools
...and...
Equally, if they want their DC moved up a reading group or extra phonics homework or a place at cricket club, that is what they are paying for
Dear me, where do I start? Firstly, let’s consider riding schools - a place that people go to take their children to in order to learn how to safely sit on a half ton animal with a mind of its own. Any riding school worth it’s salt will always underhorse rather than overhorse a pupil. Overhorsing leads to accidents and I am fairly sure the sort of person who would demand a ‘better horse’ because they are paying for it is almost certainly also the sort of person who would sue the riding school if they were given a horse or pony their child couldn’t manage and had an accident on. I have seen many a rider who claims to be a good rider when in fact they are mediocre at best and a more forward horse would make mincemeat of them. A riding school is in the business of teaching people the correct aids in order to take part in safe, effective and enjoyable riding. Never have I seen a riding school offer ‘fast’ ponies, but nor have I seen them offer slow ponies either. Quite often, if a rider is struggling with a pony that is too slow it is because the rider is an ineffective one, and the best way to get a faster pony is not to get on a different one but to ride the one they are on better, which can only be done if they are not chopping and changing onto ponies they find easier.
My own horses and ponies can all be either too slow or too fast depending on who is on them and how they are riding - I once had a gigantic heavyweight show hunter, 18 hands and 800kg. Massive. He was used to interview potential grooms for a fancy dressage yard. Many of the candidates quaked when he was led out for them to ride, but he plodded round the arena like a riding school dobbin and they breathed a sigh of relief that he was not a snorting giant nutcase. The groom who got the job got on him though, tolerated the plodding for a couple of minutes, and then said to him ‘come on, I’m sure you are capable of more than this,’ gathered him up and gave him a boot in the ribs and suddenly he turned from plodder into the RIHS quality show horse he actually was, albeit a lazy one. The issue here was not with the horse, it was with the riders, and I don’t need to use much imagination to guess that it was the same case with the demanding mother and her average child.
WRT to the reading group or cricket club - do you honestly think that the way private facilities work is to demand your child is moved up because you are paying for it? Excuse me while I stop laughing! Quite simply, what you are paying for is not to get the level you demand, but the teaching to get the child good enough to move up to that level. And it’s net exclusive to the private sector. What you are demonstrating brilliantly though is that there is a small section of society out there that firmly believes that money can make up for any amount of lack of talent. Money can help uncover, fine tune and promote talent, that’s true, but it cannot be a substitute for it, no matter how much you are able to pay.