The system in the uk is not stacked against us, sure there is room for improvement and discussion but to say it is stacked against us... Is well.. Hysterical
If the system is "not stacked against us", how do you explain the appallingly low conviction rate of 1.7% for reported rapes? Were the other 98.3% of rapes false allegations?
How do you explain the figures of victims of partner abuse (6.3% women, 2.7% men, so nearly 2.5 times as prevalent) if "the system" does not put women more at risk in their own homes than men?
How many men are trafficked or otherwise forced into sex work? (Imo, someone forced into sex work is being raped every time they have sex with a client, because they are not consenting, they are coerced).
The only area I can think of where men are systematically disadvantaged in matters of violence is the lack of services, including refuge places, for men suffering domestic abuse.
My first experience of sexual assault happened when I was 12 years old. My most recent was when I was 65. I doubt if, at any point, I've gone for more than 5 years without some sort of offence being perpetrated against me by a man, whether it's a frotter on a crowded tube, DV at the hands of my first partner or emotional abuse by my ex-husband.
That's 53 years of being victimised by arseholes and misogynists, simply because I'm in possession of a vagina and 2 x-chromosomes.
And it is systematic, it's because for the vast majority of our history, society and its structures (political, economic, judicial and social) have been created by men, with scant regard for how they affect women. That's the system.
And you're part of the problem, bringing the word "hysterical", which is in itself misogynistic, into a discussion like this. Check the etymology if you don't understand why.