I'm really fucking tired of the double standards on this thread.
15 is a child. It is below the age of consent.
A few people have mentioned the horrific abuse that went on in Rochdale. One 15yo victim of the Rochdale gang acted as a recruiter, drawing in other girls who were also abused. Most of the victims were white. I think we would all agree that these were children, unable to properly consent to what happened to them, and that they were victims of grooming and sexual exploitation.
Shamina Begum was the same age as those children, but according to some posters on here, she shouldn't be regarded as a child, she fully consented to what happened to her (despite having been under the legal age of consent) and she can't possibly have been groomed.
The situations are not directly comparable for sure, but the differences are quite telling.
My child is mixed race. She was born in the UK and has never lived anywhere other than the UK. She has never had anything other than a British passport, but it just so happens that her father was born overseas. Please tell me why it is fair that my dd and her white British best friend could commit exactly the same crime and yet one could be stripped of her citizenship while the other would not. Is my daughter less entitled to her British citizenship? Is it ok that she has somehow been demoted to a second class citizen?
Of course, I am pretty confident that neither my dd or her friend are in danger of committing any crimes that might put them in this situation, but there is a principle here that is important. Why should one group of people face more severe punishment than another? Why should some British citizens be less entitled than others? And please don't tell me that this isn't about race, because yes, it's true that white people can have their citizenship revoked if they have dual nationality, but the reality is that this approach will impact disproportionately on black and brown people. And that is not fair.