[quote Sunflowergirl1]@Schonerlebnis
"comparing the economy to a household budget is ludicrous"
I'm sorry but it isn't ludicrous. The principal is that year in and year out you can't keep spending more than you have as income and that is what has happened in this country for far to long. It used to be that borrowing was used to even out the economic cycles..but no longer.
I have simplistic the principal as not all MN contributors are economists but the IFS are are the same conclusion.
At some point unless the National income increases substantially (which is unlikely due to Covid and Brexit) spending will have to be cut and cut to painful levels[/quote]
Except most Western economies have routinely run deficits throughout the modern era. Indeed our economies are dependent upon it.
The IFS is primarily a policy unit in this regard and they promote this idea that governments should only spend what they earn, not has some fundament of economic reality but as a point of political ideology. It is what they believe, like unicorns in the mist. This has long been a criticism of the supposedly 'ideology free' IFS.
You can't equate households with national economies for very obvious reasons:
- households can't print their own money
- households have to earn first before paying for things (that includes convincing others to give them money in the form of loans).
- households do not have investors lining up to buy their debt on long term terms.
The UK government can print its own money, has its own bank that is legally obliged to pay its bills regardless, and has institutional investors (such as pension funds) who rely on its debt as stable parts of their portfolios.
The problem the government needs to guard against is not that it can't balance the books, because it doesn't matter that it does, but that it doesn't end up in an inflationary spiral. The idea that a decent pay rise for NHS staff, which in essence actually pumps money into the private economy, is the thing that will tip us into runaway inflation is nonsense.
This is not an economic decision, it is a political one. The economic arguments are just window dressing.
Let us remember that a decade of austerity (the means by which the books are attempted to be balanced) has just led to poor productivity, a weak economy, enhanced borrowing and increased inequality. It simply doesn't work.You can't cut your way out of a recession. It is a constant source of amazement to see that the arguments that the government is using to claim it can't afford to pay nurses more are still being defended by apparently intelligent people after the last 10 years.