I never had biological children but we inherited a niece and nephew a few years ago who are now teenagers.
I never wanted children, not because I'm materialistic or liked exotic holidays, or was too immature to cope with responsibility or too emotionally shallow to know true love. I just didn't want them and felt as strongly about that as my sister who really wanted them.
My life, my husbands life, has been good. We have both worked abroad, we have time for each other and we have a great group of friends. We've volunteered to build schools in Africa, have sponsored children and have both been school governors. Before our niece and nephew came to live with us full time we frequently looked after them, took them on days out and holidays and supported them.
I don't know if we would have done as much as we have to help support lots of children had we had our own - but somehow I doubt it because we would not have had the time or the headspace. It doesn't make us inherently superior to parents, but nor does being childfree make us a moral vacuum.
I'm not a great believer in unconditional love. I didn't love my mother and she didn't love me. I know I love my dad, my husband, my dog and the teenagers and that's good enough for me. I have no desire to give birth just to see if I can feel unconditional love.
As we got older we made choices about how we wanted to live in the next phase of our lives and so we moved to Cornwall from London and made choices about our careers. Neither of us have ever been wild party animals, but as we get older our lives naturally change. That's the case whether you're a parent or not.
My life is not, has not been, and will never be less fulfilling and less worthy than someone who has biological children. I've never been family oriented and frankly, apart from my dad, wouldn't care if I never saw another family member again. I don't believe that having children of my own would have changed my mind that my brother is a complete and utter twat and my mother a toxic waste dump of a human being.