@cyclingmad
I'm a long-time lurker on these threads. I think many posters have been happy to engage with you, and have shared links and evidence to back up what they're saying. In response your tone (and you may not mean it like this - it's a difficult medium within which to convey tone) seems increasingly aggressive and it's coming across, to a bystander, as though you are making a concerted attempt to derail the - very informative - threads rather than partake in reasoned discussion.
FWIW, I agree that you can criticise anyone for rioting (or whatever), regardless of their political affiliations, and I think a balanced centrist approach is sorely lacking in society and politics over the past few years and that's why we've ended up in this place with Trump, Boris, Brexit etc. but it seems wilfully obtuse to say 'both sides are just as bad' on this specific issue. I don't see how it's a problem to agree the facts: there was a left-wing anarchist, there were several thousand Trump supporters / right-wing anarchists and Trump clearly incited some form of insurrection, an activity which wasn't confined to 06 January, but started prior to the November election when he began to think he was going to lose (see: pretty much the entirety of Seth Abramson's Twitter feed). I don't like a lot of what the Democratic Party does and believes in, same for the Republicans, for Labour, Tories, Conservatives, Greens etc. There's also far too much corruption in politics. Unfortunately, as much discussed in previous threads, power attracts the wrong kind of people, whether that be in politics, business or religion, and our societal structures amply reward those who don't abide by Utilitarian principles (greatest good for the greatest number).
I'll get off my soapbox now 