This is why more right-wing parties are obsessed with identity politics – but only the right sort of identity politics.
Groups which want to hoard resources, as a PP described, have no intention of doing anything which involves sharing those resources with people further down the economic pile (except where sharing might mean the rising tide lifts their own boat too, and even then they often won't take that chance).
So they have literally nothing to offer economically poorer voters except jingoism and identity politics.
Of course, mostly they don't refer to their actions as "identity politics".* That's generally a term for anyone who has the temerity to suggest police violence against black people has a racist element; or women are being disadvantaged by designers using male bodies as the default in car design.
Having dedicatedly pursued dogwhistle identity politics, these parties then come out with, "Ordinary People™ are bored with the left's obsession with identity politics and will vote for us instead."
So, two bites at the cherry.
I've seen this a lot with Fox commentators (when I can steel myself to peek into Fox). Dogwhistle after spurious smear after dogwhistle... but as soon as someone names what they're doing, the talking heads gasp and yell, "You said "black"! You racist, you!"
(*The exception to this are the overt racists of the Generation Identity movement. Despite the explicit name, Generation Identity are mysteriously missing from all discussions of how "the people are fed up with identity politics." It's an interesting blind spot, that makes me wonder who is initiating the claim that the right-wing offers an escape from identity politics. Obviously things do get facilely repeated as truisms, so it's not the mere repeaters I'm primarily interested in.)