"There's really no need to start reading young. It's not what makes the difference."
See, I disagree with this. I started reading at 4 (because I wanted to, not because anyone forced me). I was always in the top set for everything, more or less BECAUSE I could read. All the other people in the top sets were the same. We could already read, so we could be left to do independent work.
Then, once you're in that top set, it never changes. I was in the top set for everything until the end of secondary school, and it was the same children who were in there with me.
Call children smart, and they'll live up to that. Call them dumb, and it's the same. I don't believe I have any more natural aptitude that anyone else, but being able to read early gave me a huge advantage. For those who couldn't read already, the first two years were spent learning to do so. For those of us who already could, we were already reading alone, doing maths problems alone and so on.
As an aside, I pronounce 'bauble' like 'bobble'. That long 'au' sound really doesn't exist in my accent or if it does, it's much shorter than in the SE English accent. Like 'lawn', I would say 'lon'.