@flaviaritt
Because the definition of imprisonment is the act of being put in prison - this girl is not in a prison - so that completely negates your point.
You can’t really believe this.
Well yes, I do - seeing as it's the definition in the Oxford English dictionary, Cambridge etc. Do you just prefer to twist reality to meet your own definitions instead of widely accepted ones?
This is exactly how we get things like this:
www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8808035/Covid-spread-girl-13-11-family-members-house.html
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6940e2.htm
I just think British people are largely selfish as fuck now to be honest. You don't get this kind of thing in a lot of other countries.
And the NHS, yet again, have to pick up the pieces.
You know the average age of a healthcare worker to die of Covid is 56 years old? And often, because people are so selfish, they are exposed over and over - and as the severity is linked to a culmulative exposure, they are the ones who suffer. Yet I bet you would be the first to go running to them if you contracted it and needed help after willingly exposing yourself - or not doing anything any reasonable person would do in order to mitigate risk.
Do you really not care about other people? Do you not understand this is a pandemic - something we haven't really seen on this scale for 100 years? Do you not understand what happens if/when the hospitals are overwhelmed? It is not so much a physical shortage of beds, it is more the staff. How would you feel if the ICU is full and your family is not able to access help for any accident - there are simply no ICU beds? Because that is the position we may well end up in with unmitigated spread like this.
Also the person that said if someone has a positive test they are fine to move within their household is completely wrong. The current NHS guidance is to self-isolate for a set number of days. This is to avoid it being passed on to family members, who then may pass it on to whoever they come into contact with.