It’s forced on men, though. Why should they be deprived of this choice?
I find the protestation that feminism is always about choice quite weak. It was never about choice, unless women had been deprived of those choices available to men and not us through masculine privilege. Feminism is about equality of opportunity - the same opportunities that have always been available to men - and like men, it's a matter of individual choice as to whether we take them or not. It's about not being discriminated against, beaten, murdered, paid less, (insert ad nauseum the myriad ways women are generally disadvantaged), not about a choice of whether or not we embrace a position of disadvantage.
As the PP above comments, if 'choice' of title were so desirable and advantageous you can bet your boots men would have been clamouring for it as well. No man has ever been defined in direct accordance with his marital relationship.
Here's a goodie. Until recently if not still, if I carked it my occupation would have been listed on my death certificate as Wife of David van Arkle, Olympic Swimmer. Not Mariel van Arkle, Wedding Dress Expert.
It sticks in the craw. Of course, I'd be a gonner so not exactly in a position to mind, but you get my drift ...