I find the exact opposite to be true.
The 'animals are nicer/kinder/better than humans' brigade tend to be utterly lacking in emotional intelligence.
They are the kind of people who lack the ability to understand the nuances of human nature, and hide in the unchallenging one dimentional r'elationships' they imagine they share with animals.
People who recognise that animals shouln't be treated cruelly, but that they really are not on a par intellectually with humans are much more aware generally.
Nature matters, ecosystems matter, a balance on the planet is important. But an animal is just an animal.
People who say they are not animal types are generally using it as a way to signal that they aren't going to ascribe emotions/intellectual attributes to an animal which are unrealistic.
A sort of reaction against the kind of people who say an animal dying is on a par with the death of a person.
I don't look at a puppy and think 'aww, cute' any more than I'd think a worm, or a tortoise, or a chicken was cute. I don't hate them, I'm not cruel to them, but I have no real interest in them.
Animals don't really register with me, but nor do lots of other things unless I have had some particular reason to seek them out/take an interest.