@GimmeAy
Whether you literally state that all transwomen are predatory or not, when you insist on using the actions of a tiny minority to exclude the entire group, you ARE inferring the group as a whole are the problem. It's exactly the same conflation that was made back when people used to argue that homosexual men couldn't be trusted around children because some men sexually abused boys.
Perfectly put.
You simply misunderstand the issue.
Gender critical people believe that it is the fact of being male that makes men a risk to women. Even though the majority of men pose no risk to women, on the basis that some do, and it is not possible to know which, the entire group is excluded. No one seems to argue, incidentally, that excluding men means people are saying all men are rapists.
Anyway, now consider where this issue of bathe risk arising from being male leaves trans women.
It is true that trans women are at risk from male violence, and this is why I don’t agree with people who just say they should use the men’s. But if it is right (as evidence suggests) trans women pose an equivalent risk to women as a man (which means most of them don’t in the same way most men don’t), then we need to have a sensible conversation about how to deal with that.
If there is evidence that identifying as a woman reduces the risk posed by being born and socialised male, then present it and make the argument. Otherwise you need to accept opening women’s spaces to anyone who says they identify as a woman will increase the risk to women, even if it is only from a small minority (as, I repeat, is the same with men), so there’s an issue we need to resolve.
There is no logical basis for saying that wanting this conversation means all trans women are predators. Of course they aren’t. Most aren’t. But that doesn’t mean it’s as simple as everyone who says they identify as a woman should be able to enter women’s spaces at will, and the quoted post and agreement show a fundamental lack of understanding on your parts.