My point still stands though, just because something is very infectious doesn't mean its more likely to kill you.
It can, if you are also more likely to catch it.
Say, a disease only affects 1% of the population, but causes 10% deaths.
In 1 million people, it only affects 10 000 people and kills 1000.
Another disease affects 20% of the population, but causes 1% deaths.
In 1 million people, it will affect 200 000 people and will kill 2000.
So, you are 2x more likely to die of the the more infectious, but less deadly disease.
At the moment, the number of people infected is a very small percentage, but it already represents a significant number that can spread through different countries. If it goes to flu numbers of infected people, it will cause a similar number of deaths (assuming similar mortality rate) on top of those already killed by the flu. But if it gets to a higher number of infected people, then you have more deaths, and you have a higher risk of dying from it than from the flu.