Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to ask you if you are worried about the new Coronavirus?

999 replies

IvyBush123 · 04/02/2020 06:41

I am not sure if there is reason to worry about the new Coronavirus. I am not a medical expert but to be honest feel a bit scared because we know so little and some experts seem worried. How do you think?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Random18 · 10/02/2020 17:07

2 surgeries closed now being reported

ofwarren · 10/02/2020 17:11

British Airways has announced it has cancelled all its flights to Beijing and Shanghai until 1 April due to the Coronavirus outbreak

AuntieStella · 10/02/2020 17:19

"Are there many cases in Russia, with it bordering China?"

Two

This has been linked before (and thanks to the poster who did) and it seems to be reliable:

gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6

IvyBush123 · 10/02/2020 17:20

This is so sad. People of Wuhan celebrating new countdown on December 31st.

twitter.com/WLaowai8/status/1225637845508837377

Everybody so happy and cheerful and just a short time later they are afraid for their lifes. Sad

OP posts:
YoursTunbridgeWells · 10/02/2020 17:33

Anyone just heard the Imperial College bloke on Radio 4 - predicting 472000 deaths in the UK - with 60-70% of UK infected and 1% death rate?

Bold statement but he's no fool.

covetingthepreciousthings · 10/02/2020 17:34

Anyone just heard the Imperial College bloke on Radio 4 - predicting 472000 deaths in the UK - with 60-70% of UK infected and 1% death rate?

No, but that sounds concerning.

Emmabryant123 · 10/02/2020 17:45

Oh come off it.
How can he possibly know that ?
Right. I really am off now. This thread is beyond scaremongering

brainfogg · 10/02/2020 17:51

@SlayB that’s disgusting about the checkout worker, I can understand people not worrying anxiously about all of this, but how can they be so blinkered and clueless as to have zero awareness of their own germs and how they might affect others? Or how they’re not protecting themselves from ill people either?

That’s absolutely awful for the poor guy in the Phillipines having to deal with all 3 of those illnesses at once. Feel so sad about that actually.

@YoursTunbridgeWells omg that is terrifying!! Shock we’re screwed then basically.

HIVpos · 10/02/2020 17:54

Can I suggest that if anyone has any info from what they‘ve read or heard they post links to the source? Statements made In the media might be true, but equally can be taken out of context or from a less than reliable source. This way needless scaremongering can’t be prevented and the more qualified amongst us can decipher what’s been said after being given the source.

(Not saying you heard wrong TWells, but this might be helpful to those prone to excessive anxiety.)

notanothergiftcard · 10/02/2020 17:55

To be fair a 1 per cent death rate out of 472k is 4700 people. Horrible, but we are not talking half the population wiped out here. Most of those people are likely to be the elderly and those who are already ill.

I am not saying that they are dispensible - I have several family members with pre existing health conditions, including my own DH who has Crohn's disease. But what can we do other than continue to take reasonable precaution.

Similar predictions arose WRT swine flu and bird flu.

There was a Jon Ronson article ages ago where he writes about accidentally getting cc'd into some emails between phycisists working fairly high up in the CIA, who were swapping horror stories about various things they predicted were likely happen imminently (including nuclear war with Iran and terrorists using bird flu as a bio weapon). This was way back in the early noughties. My point here is that experts, as knowledgeable as they are, also tend to be paranoid.

notanothergiftcard · 10/02/2020 17:56

we’re screwed then basically.

Of course we aren't. 472k people and a 1 per cent death rate isn't even 5000 deaths. Please think logically here! And that's even if it's true!

notanothergiftcard · 10/02/2020 17:57

Can I suggest that if anyone has any info from what they‘ve read or heard they post links to the source? Statements made In the media might be true, but equally can be taken out of context or from a less than reliable source. This way needless scaremongering can’t be prevented and the more qualified amongst us can decipher what’s been said after being given the source.

100 per cent that. I think it's grossly irresponsible to post things you've heard in the media which aren't verifiable, on a thread where a large number of people quite clearly suffer from excessive anxiety.

brainfogg · 10/02/2020 17:58

@notanothergiftcard I’m sure the post said 472k deaths not infected, if it was that number with the virus and then and then 1% death rate I wouldn’t be as freaked out!

justdeckingthehalls1 · 10/02/2020 17:59

No no, read it again. 60-70% infected is 36-42 million people. 1% of that is 360-420,000 deaths

lucy101 · 10/02/2020 18:04

I think 60-70% infection over the course of year (until he hopefully have a vaccine which is starting to be rolled out) sounds about right.

I think the death rate will be higher than a 1% death rate as I don't believe that the NHS can cope with those numbers.

It might be 1% at the start but as healthcare workers get ill it may well go up.

Repeated exposure is a significant problem (viral load), hence young previously healthy doctors etc. dying in China.

notanothergiftcard · 10/02/2020 18:04

Oh yes my apologies, I read it wrong!

HIVpos · 10/02/2020 18:06

www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p082vzd3

Just listened to this - BBC podcast by experts earlier today. Quite well explained I think.

justdeckingthehalls1 · 10/02/2020 18:06

Does anyone have a source for that though? Can't see anything in R4 website

justdeckingthehalls1 · 10/02/2020 18:07

Oh cross post. Is it mentioned on that podcast?

FromEden · 10/02/2020 18:08

Anyone just heard the Imperial College bloke on Radio 4 - predicting 472000 deaths in the UK - with 60-70% of UK infected and 1% death rate?

I didnt hear it but surely thats worst case scenario? As in what would happen if no preventative measures were taken and no plans implemented to stop the spread. I mean, most countries have experts employed to draw up these plans which will be put into effect at the first sign of a sustained outbreak. They are already working on developing new treatments and a vaccine. It's very unlikely to get to that point.

No need to freak out. Practice good hygiene, wash your hands frequently, dont touch your face, clean regularly touched surfaces in your home daily. You'll more than likely be fine.

justdeckingthehalls1 · 10/02/2020 18:10

Depends. Unverified sources are suggesting airborne transmission. There's very little that can be done to stop it if that's truly the case

NemophilistRebel · 10/02/2020 18:11

i read the imperial college paper, it's bloody scary, but it really is a report for the worst case scenario.

If anyone wants to read the full report the link to it is here:

www.imperial.ac.uk/media/imperial-college/medicine/sph/ide/gida-fellowships/Imperial-College-2019-nCoV-severity-10-02-2020.pdf

Abraid2 · 10/02/2020 18:12

I heard that same interview on the BBC Radio Pm programme too. 60% of 60 million is 36 million with the virus. One per cent fatalities of 36 million cases is 360,000 people, isn’t it?

Abraid2 · 10/02/2020 18:14

The programme isn’t up on the Sounds app yet to post links but it was some time in the first half, between five and 5.30pm.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page