@Valanice1989
You're not making the point you think you are. Of course people start off on party drugs and move on to hard drugs. That is exactly my point. How many people try drugs at university? To my shame, even I once tried coke and hugely regret it, due to the devastation that causes along the supply chain and then to people who become addicted to it. But for myself, no, I don't regret it, as, lucky for me, it was a very stupid one off and barely effected me at all.
But, why is it then, that me choosing to do that did not lead to heavier drugs? It's because I'm lucky. My group of friends never included people who were addicted to drugs, although some of us were foolish enough to do as I did and try them out. Many people, including a huge proportion of public figures, do the same, (Michael Gove, George Osborne I think too? Many journalists at that time and god knows how many models and pop stars), and they go on to lead perfectly normal lives, with just a "what a twat I was that time" story to tell.
Then, there are people who become addicts. There is an enormous difference and it isn't just because "I want there to be a distinction between party drugs and heroin". If anything, 'party drugs' are worse, because people do choose to take them, for fun.
But people who are addicted to drugs, like crack and heroin, didn't wake up one day, in a middle class home, with a supportive family, a degree, decent job prospects, good mental health and decide "I know; I'm going to start taking crack and heroin today". That is bollocks and when you drone on about them 'taking agency', I just think WHAT?! Have you seen these people? What agency have they got?
I take it from your dig at the government, you consider yourself to be a liberal. Well, have a think at what you are saying, intersectionality and your (and my) privilege in comparison to what leads people to heroin and crack addiction. Really think about it, before you try to be clever and holier than thou about it.
Also, while on an individual level, encouraging addicts to take agency as a way if regaining control, might be beneficial, it needs to be in a way which is positive for them, not a stick to beat them with, which, like it or not, is what your posts read as. Please God tell me you don't work with addicts? Because you need a lesson in how to communicate your views on them in a less harsh way, without the big sweeping statements about how society has gone to the dogs and back when it were all fields round here... Listen to yourself ffs.