@XXcstatic, I don’t actually have any small children eligible for any discounts.
Your point about child discounts is entirely different and beside the point. My impression is that businesses offer them because it is profitable for them to do so.
@BitOfFun , no, I don’t think my ‘comparison’ is crass at all. If a society chooses to discriminate, then they should be clear that they are making that choice.
My personal view is that discrimination based on colour, gender, ethnic or national origin, religion, sexual orientation, and age ought to be illegal - and, to some extent, it is.
I am simply interested that you cannot discriminate against old people (I am over 65), and that is in many cases (rightly in my view) socially unacceptable, but you can discriminate against young people, apparently.
I am just suggesting that people see this as a matter of discrimination. But also a matter of discrimination against young parents.
I do not think my view is “crass”, and I have very little “skin in this game” since I am well beyond the point of getting either thrown out of restaurants or getting child discounts.
But I think folks should think clearly about discrimination and how far it should go.
My view is that OP was unreasonably discriminated against, and that she should have been protected under the law. Other folks may (and obviously do) have different opinions, but if you welcome that discrimination, I think you should be honest enough to accept that that is what it is, and that it is not different from most other discriminations. It’s just one that you happen to be on board with.