Before we got married, we discussed my paying towards the house. I said that I would like to speak with a financial advisor or similar to get something in writing, for both our sakes - just to make sure everything was clear as regards what money would be ringfenced, what would happen if the house lost or gained value etc. This suggestion was like a huge slap in his face. He was furious that we couldn't just agree things verbally and led him to not trust me enough to even want to consider adding me to the deeds.
So he has a temper that he is capable of putting to use.
And you must trust him...
He then asked me to send him an email confirming that, should anything happen and should our marriage end, I would not make a claim on the house.
...but he gets to distrust you and makes you give him explicit assurances in writing. This attack on you (this is what it was) was massively abusive on his part.
(And I may be wrong here but this unethical demand of his could get him struck off the Rolls.)
I was angry at how little he trusted me and genuinely did not want to jepardise his children's inheritance (thinking I would just buy something myself as soon as I could and have a separate investment), so I sent him this email.
Did he accuse you of wanting to jeopardise his existing children's interest in the home?
Regardless, you scrambled to reassure him, thus telling him that this relationship was more important to you than your own self-interest, and that he could continue to abuse you.
That was actually what he was looking for, not any reassurance about his children's inheritance.
He cracked the whip. You jumped. He won the first round.
He really isn't a bad man.

He didn't ask me to pay towards anything for the first 8 or 9 months of moving in so that I could pay off my debts...
Nice of him to support you after refusing to give you any claim on the house you were calling your home...
...(not big debts, but credit cards etc.Not more than 10k including old student loan).
You are defensive here, and I suspect he has held this over you more than once.
His absolute intolerance of any debt has made him believe that I am not financially responsible though, which is also why he doesn't want us to join finances - which, considering I have never been anything but financially independent is really insulting but I have just thought I could earn his trust over time.
And there is it, you thought you could earn his trust.
This is the abusive basis of the relationship.
You ask why I married him. The financial concerns almost broke us and tbh, I almost didn't, but I love him and thought this was something we could work on/work out over time. Until I fell pregnant, it didn't cast such a shadow and I didn't expect it to get this bad. I never thought he would be do unrealistic in his expectations of me/my ability to remain financially independent should I become a mother to our child.
You married him because you were hooked. You rose to his challenge - to work hard and prove that this man you loved could trust you.
He paid for the IVF and was absolutely desperate for us to have a child together - possibly more so than me. Which adds to my confusion. (I paid for the wedding so as to balance this out.)
It was HIS idea to get married and to get married so quickly. I was very happy to be asked but also surprised at the trust this demonstrated - hence why I thought he would change and trust me more over time.
It was HIS idea to get married and to get married so quickly.
And I notice how you were happy that you were making progress in working on the challenge he set out for you, to gain his trust
.
He wanted you trapped. He now has a captive victim, which is what he wanted from this relationship.
Wanting a quick commitment and a quick baby to limit your room for manouver has red flags all over it.
The only other point worth clarifying is that I have moved 2.5 hours away from my family to be with him. I work from home so have little to no social or support network nearby. If we did separate, I would have to move away from him and close to my family. I only waited so long to have a baby because I wanted a family, not just a baby, so to break us up and add such a distance between our child and it's father is something I'm very reluctant to do.
Of course you have moved away from your natural support, from people who would notice if you were miserable.
You are isolated from family who could help you out on a daily basis and you are coming to a time when you will need support both financial and emotional. This is an ideal situation from the abuser's pov.
Why are you reluctant to put distance between the baby and its father? This man is nothing more than a sperm donor, according to his own insistence on not paying any costs related to the baby and evidenced by the fact that you had to press him to include this baby with the other children wrt inheritance.
Somehow or other this man has convinced you that you owe him. You owe him evidence that he can trust you, and now you owe him access to a baby he doesn't give a damn about. Meanwhile, he owes you nothing. No support in any form.
And you think he would treat a baby any differently?
You are doing a lot of wishful thinking in this relationship and I urge you to stop that and start viewing this man as an adversary, not a friend, who will never be anything more than what he has shown himself to be - callous, cruel, cold, abusive, and very, very angry.
When someone tells you who they are, you need to pay attention and believe them.
Please call Women's Aid and get stuck into therapy.
0808 2000 247.
Leave a message. Ask them to call you back at a convenient time.
Please leave asap, and move back in with your parents.
Would they be able to help you to find and pay for a solicitor?
As I don't contribute to the mortgage but do have a roof over my head, my husband actually thinks I am the one who is mean with money, as I only pay half the bills and buy food shopping. I think this is why he expects me to be buying all the bits for the baby.
What utter self-serving, abusive nonsense on his part.
He has very effectively put you on the defensive, hasn't he?
I may seem mean to not pay more but I refuse to pay towards an asset that will never be mine (the house) so he can have more free cash to save - giving him even more financial security whilst all my income us spent on the day-to-day with nothing left over for savings.
What is this about 'seeming mean'? Did he say this? Do you feel this is really what is happening here - that you are being mean?
How would you categorise refusal to buy new gear and clothes for your own baby?
You are already giving him plenty of free cash for bills, and as a result you have none left for your own most pressing need - a solicitor to handle your divorce.
He has succeeded in losing you in a fog of guilt, obligation and emotional debt to him.
Sorry for all the detail but it is a complicated one. I am applying for SMO but it will only cover the cost of my car, phone bill, and other small outgoings as well as the bare minimum of baby supplies and good, so I worry I would not be able to survive on this alone and will have no choice but to return to work almost immediately.
This is all so incredibly sad.
You are describing horrible abuse in great detail and you can't see it for what it is.
Some words on abuse:
It often rears its head - or switches into high gear - during pregnancy.
Some men use a woman's previous relationships as a means of controlling them and inflicting abuse on them. The dynamic is that they make the woman prove her trustworthiness but they accuse her constantly, and use her lack of trustworthiness as an excuse for control and abuse of all kinds.
This one is instead using your (completely normal) debt and your freelance work/ vulnerability to lack of income. He is also punishing you for standing up for yourself at the start of the relationship.
On top of all that, he is now using your pregnancy and impending motherhood/ unavailability for work to abuse you. He is piling on pressure from a financial pov, causing you great distress. He is getting a great kick from painting you into a corner and watching your distress and desperation.
It is all abuse, pure and simple.
Maybe you are right that he isn't a bad man. Given the evidence of coldness, cruelty and complete selfishness you have described, I would go so far as to say you are married to a psychopath, and I agree 100% with NettleTea's post.
@Bellyfish1, what you are describing is classic abuse.
There is absolutely no future for this relationship.