If a family meet the threshold for SS involvement it is important that they establish whether the mother (or primary care giver) is able to put the needs and welfare of the children above their own needs and the abusive relationship. For some primary care givers, this is very hard. Some succeed with support but have to learn, some do not learn.
The assumption that all women (or PCG’s) are hapless helpless victims is upsetting for children who grew up in these homes who feel that things could/should have been different, and perhaps if the support of another agency was involved, things may have been different.
Issues with secrecy in the past are huge. Whether the drivers was shame, financial etc they still existed and children were trapped in abusive homes with no way out. A lot of this was down to lack of support systems or intervention, but times have changed and there is more support than ever before
Both my Dsis and I realised when we became parents that had SS been involved with us, it’s very likely we would have been removed. And they should have been involved. Neither of us think our DM had the capacity to effect the relevant changes to our lives, even with support - when he did finally leave her, she was even worse at parenting than before and essentially completely gave up on trying. She never went to the GP and asked for support, she never acknowledged any need for her to seek help and make changes. Him being gone exposed her deepest fears and weaknesses - being alone
My DM actively came up with her own well thought out plan as to how to ‘protect’ us from a child sex offender, which shows some insight into knowing she needed one. The plan was a failure from the off, it was too late by the time she formulated her plan, something had already happened. And as time went on, her plan didn’t actually have much substance to it and looking back - the child sex offender still babysat us, came round every weekend and came on days out - just that she ‘watched him carefully’ 🤷🏻♀️