glass I mean, that wasn't even my point anyway. My point is that it's a stupid thing to argue about.
I care about women. Not about whether we can say a body is owned or not. Who cares how you phrase it? That's of no interest to me.
That's fine - it doesn't have to be interesting to you. I personally do care about it because it's an attitude that is harmful to women and actively contributes to the stigmatisation of sex workers (stigmatisation which often works to prevent them seeking support). For that reason I absolutely don't think it's stupid to argue about it.
With sex work, the woman’s body IS the product.
No, it isn't. Sex workers aren't slaves. They don't sell their bodies because selling something requires a transfer of ownership, and nothing a person does with their body compromises their right of ownership over it.
Sex work is selling a service (sex), not a product (bodies).
This is an attitude which is actively harmful to women. Even though it's not your intention, even though you want the opposite, what you are doing is normalising and promoting the idea that sex workers don't have the right to say no, that they are objects, that once men have paid them they can do whatever they like. None of that is true, and people believing that it is is harmful to sex workers.
You can be opposed to sex work without promoting this really dangerous and hostile concept that sex workers don't own their bodies.