Ok to all the people who seem to think it’s 1950s or whatever to take your DH name...
Time and time again on here we hear the argument, “Yes my name was my father’s name but because I was born with it is MY name, just as it is my brother’s.... blah blah”
Yes nobody is disputing it is YOUR name.
But (sorry to shout), YOU HAVE THAT NAME BECAUSE IT WAS PASSED TO YOU VIA THE PATRIARCHAL NAMING TRADITION.”
So whether you acquire your name via your father or your DH, it is EXACTLY THE SAME TRADITION. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE!
Why why why can’t some people understand this???
If you had your mothers name, then that would be different. But if your surname was passed to you from your father, you don’t have a leg to stand on when berating other women for taking their DH’s names.
When I was born with my father’s name, that became MY name. The name I identify with. Yet it came from a man. No two ways about it. When I took my husband’s name it became MY name. The name I identify with. Yet it came from another man. No two ways about it.
At least there was choice involved in the second instance.
If you have your mother’s name or have created a new name, then fair enough. But otherwise, please stop being hypocrites.