It's not about attributes. You just... know. You know how you identify. It's something that makes up 'you'. That 'you' would still be you if you were a brain in a jar. That's your identity. And part of that identity is your gender.
The reason you can't list of each of the attributes is because being female isn't a feeling. It's a material reality and a description of reproductive potential.
What you're talking about is how some men like to be feminine. They like the idea of what they perceive woman to be.
We can all see it. It's as plain as day, when some of them walk around in fishnet stockings, plunging bras, overly made up faces and long blonde wigs. It's not a difficult concept for people to grasp, for heavens sake. What it is, is highly sexist and detrimental to actual women.
Gender dysphoria, again, a well recognised condition. Where a person will reject their anatomy. On the basis that they don't feel as though their anatomy fits them, because people are telling them that their personality is wrong for that type of body.
It's so bloody regressive. And transgender ideology perpetuates it.
Telling men and women that if they want to display the attributes (superficial attributes), of the opposite sex, they must become the opposite sex only serves to perpetuate the idea that their bodies were wrong in the first place. Those attributes are not for them.
I'm astonished you can't see it.
Jackie Green told her (then) son that his preference for toy dolls was wrong. She took all his toys away, ffs. And took him to the doctor. She told him, categorically, that he was the wrong sex for those toys.
So he transitioned.
My first inkling of how sexist this all is was when a transwoman on here told me that they wanted to transition so they could feel more 'vibrant'.
They felt utterly unable to be vibrant as a man. By agreeing to the ideology, they were saying that men can't be vibrant.
Women can't like girls, or wear hobnailed boots, and wield a chainsaw. Men can't be vibrant and wear silk.
And I thought we were getting somewhere. We're going backwards.