Except that doesn't appear to be borne out by the wholly non-political evidence of the tape. Anyone who believes that the Guardian would have publicised the existence of the tape if it doesn't back up what they have published urgently needs a rationality transplant.
Then why have they published no transcript or the tape? It can’t be an injunction, the courts are closed and have been since the story broke.
The Guardian were publishing pictures of the back seat of his car last week insinuating it was too messy to belong to someone capable of being PM because there was a load of his kids detritus in the back. It’s not like the reknowned for particularly reliable or impartial reporting these days.
The people who recorded the tape lied. They said they had no political interest outside of voting Remain but they’ve been investigated and it’s turned out they’re both activists and both of their salaries are paid via EU funding.
We also know it’s true Carrie was linked to the Worboys case.
You might also have noticed that the story from the tapers were framed. They actually said relatively little and they don’t contradict the nursery teachers account, they just chose to leave important bits of information out by not identifying the sex of the shouter. The entire story is based on insinuation on there part and selective presentation of information to give the impression DV was occurring whilst never actually saying it had (because they know it hadn’t so they won’t actually say it and get sued).
So Boris, Carrie, the police and the impartial neighbours have said there was no issue, even the Guardian has reluctantly reported that other neighbours gave completely different accounts.
But we’re supposed to believe two people who on this issue are known to have repeatedly lied. Boris I can understand people disbelieving him but I can’t see why Carrie or a nursery teacher should be accused of lying.