What beats me is that many Vegans expect me to have a meat-free option at a dinner party, but almost never do they offer me a meat option.
Why do people make this stupid point? If someone with an allergy to mushrooms is hosting a dinner party do you expect to be offered an alternative dish which included mushrooms? Just because you eat a certain ingredient (e.g. meat) does not mean you can expect it to be provided at every meal. That said the vegan would be unreasonable to expect you to only provide vegan food at your dinner party as long as you did a dish for them.
It's not a stupid point at all. Mushrooms are just one ingredient option. Meat and dairy are two entire food groups. Would you find it acceptable if somebody who was a big carbohydrate fan invited you to a meal consisting of huge plates of potatoes, rice, chips and bread and nothing else? After all, they've provided plenty of food, so why would anybody grumble at there being no vegetables, no pulses, no meat, no fruit, no dairy….?
I think a lot of people think that people eat meat deliberately to be difficult or to prove a point, when the ones who seem to be trying to prove a point are SOME vegans. We need food to survive and food comes from living organisms which we kill in order to eat - and usually, in the case of crops and fruit, we have to actively kill competitors for that food so as to preserve it for ourselves.
As for insisting on calling meat ‘dead flesh’ or ‘carcase’ etc, it just makes those vegans who do that incessantly sound rather silly. Yes, we know where meat comes from and we obviously have no problem with that – otherwise we wouldn't eat it. Should we routinely refer to apples as ‘tree babies’ or sheets of paper as ‘dead trees’?
It would be like a Muslim or Jew constantly screeching to a non-Muslim or non-Jew that the food we're about to eat is not halal or kosher. It's important to them for their food consumption, but others couldn't care less when it comes to their food.