At 58 to be Leaching at Johnny Dep

[user1497997754]

To be honest I very rarely see anyone I fancy apart from my DH these days. But I have just watched him singing in his band Hollywood Vampires singing a cover version of Hero's David Bowie and he has awakened latent desire in my nether regions lol......anyone else out there think he is horny as fuck or is it just little old me x

What chat show did she have the black eye on btw? I've seen it before but can't remember what it was.

What about Charlie Hunnam who played Utred in Last Kingdom

Uhtred was played by Alexander Dreymon in The Last Kingdom.

All the info and cctv is all over twitter. She lied. Look at thatbrianfella on twitter.

The behaviour of the paparazzi was illegal. They also faced charges. He asked his bodyguards to move her. He didn’t ask them to treat her that way. He’s their employer that’s why he paid because their behaviour was wrong.

The evidence was always there he just wanted a divorce and for it to be over. They both signed an nda saying they wouldn’t talk about it. She repeatedly did and that’s why he’s sueing her.

Yes Alexander Dreymon as Utred - he's definitely worth watching! But love Keanu too

My neighbours beagle looks just like Capt Jack Sparrow now I come to think of it.

I’m letching over Toby Stephens and Mark Bonnar at the moment. They are both 50 and I’m 58 so not quite toyboy material.

He's all yours. I've never seen the appeal and frankly think he's revolting.

Wow thatbrianfella has said nothing of the sort.

It has been in the news. He’s sueing her for defamation. You can also read the actual court documents on the fairfax county website under Hugh profile cases.

I can see you have your agenda so proceed as you wish.

I also didn’t victim blame the woman whose sex, age and disability is irrelevant. I just pointed out his bodyguards behaviour was wrong. I don’t think Johnny is an angel he has a lot of issues. He’s a human he’s fallible and he makes mistakes. But I do think he was the victim of a cruel hoax.

Got any links to all this CCTV footage?

If you're going to post on a public website, might be best to do some research first.

1. The allegations against Johnny Depp are false. There are 87 surveillance videos that prove she had no injuries, 24 witness statements, 100s of photos (complete with metadata etc) and much more evidence proving his innocence. A lot of this evidence was available at the original court case, but a lot of the videos were hidden away for some reason at the original hearing, and have only recently come to light.

Also, every single one of his previous partners has stood by him and confirmed that he was never violent with them at all.

1. It's very easy to believe a woman when she cries abuse, but it is becoming more and more obvious that there are SOME women who have lied, and used organisations like MeToo and TimesUp to further their own gain.

Women are also capable of abuse as much as a man is. Male abuse is real, it's out there, but very rarely admitted to or spoken about because we don't like to admit it.

1. The simple truth is there is no evidence of her being abused by Depp. There is however a mountain of evidence of her abusing him. Including throwing a bottle at him with such force that it severed the top off of one of his fingers. Various photos (verified) show him with bruises to his face after she had attacked him.
2. Amber Heard has admitted in court documents and proceedings that she hit him repeatedly, with fists and even a door.
3. Johnny Depp hasn't got a violent past, that a lie. The incident of the hotel room with Kate Moss was actually Kate doing the damage but he stood by her.

The other occasion you may be referring to was when the paparazzi got very close to his then heavily pregnant partner Vanessa Paradis, and nearly caused her to fall. He was protecting his partner and unborn child from potential harm.

Like I said, familiarise yourself with the actual facts about a situation, rather than depending on tabloid gossip, otherwise it's just defamation of character.
Incidentally, that is what Depp is suing her for right now because of a piece she wrote in the Washington Post.
Hope that clears a few things up for some of you.

theblast.com/46659/johnny-depp-says-surveillance-footage-proves-amber-heard-had-no-

There is more online at the twitter account I suggested. Little snippets get posted all over

Full court docs are here with her confessing to hitting him. It’s a very long read of it all but I read it all before I accused someone of being a liar. Maybe you should do the same before you call someone an abuser www.fairfaxcounty.gov/circuit/high-profile-cases

YABU. But I am biased, my XH looked like him, and was an absolute arse. I also believe JD went the same way...

As my grandmother might have said, "Handsome is as handsome does".

Forgot to add, look up the term gaslighting. Huge amount of evidence proving this is what she was doing to him.
She even defecated on the bed after punching him twice in the face because he was working late and didn't get to attend a meal for her birthday.

The alledged bruises she has mentioned whilst on the Saturday Night Love with James Corden in December 2015 have been proved to never exist by the make up artist that was working for her that night.
She said there were no bruises on her court statement.

You can barely see her face in those pictures. Not sure anyone can conclude that she didn't have bruises from those pictures alone.

Yes Johnny Depp has a long history of violence. You can believe he is innocent here but what good does denying is prior history do?

Used to fancy him, and then I saw this.

Go for it, I guess. He would probably want to smack you around afterwards but each to their own.

Let’s just see what happens in court @queenofthetofutree The lack of swelling and bruises are clear in the footage. The bruises she claimed to have and provided photos for would have been visible.

I suppose the four police officers who visited the property that night and saw no bruises were also lying. Before you make the claim well bruises take ages to come out ambers friend took pictures of the ‘bruises’ before the police arrived. And yet they saw nothing. They walked through the entire premises and saw no damage that was later listed.

Read the court documents and there are neighbours, her stylist, the building staff who all testify. No bruises.

Never been drunk Margaret? Never made a fool of yourself when you are? How would you feel if someone had secretly filmed you when you were?

Like I said he’s no angel. But that doesn’t mean he deserves to be lied about.

Let’s not forget amber heard was arrested and charged in court with domestic violence against a previous partner. She was let off on a technicality.

But I’m done with this thread. The truth is there in the court documents. Believe it don’t believe it- that’s up to you. It’s the judge who will decide.

He seemed like a twat tbh even before it became clear he's violent unstable etc

Agree keanu better bet