Well I can’t speak for anyone else, but I’m not flapping about trying to find a reason for anything.
I have explained many times now why consulting / addressing / speaking with / giving a “heads up” to the father is simply seen by some as good manners and a mark of respect. It’s just a formality really. If you can’t see that, then I’m not sure how else I can explain it.
As for this related argument of, “well the DF can’t say no, therefore it’s pointless” - this is simply irrelevant. As I said, it’s still an attempt to respect the family and do the right thing, regardless of the response.
Anyway, nobody is forcing anyone to do this if they’re dead set against it, so why all the drama?
I’m not threatened by the fact that there are still some remnants of male traditional values in society. I think I can mostly distinguish the difference between misogyny and good intention in men.
By the way, I spent many, many years in the mindset of some posters on here. I travelled solo through Asia raging against the patriarchy for years. Please don’t think for one second I don’t “see” it - in all its manifestations everywhere. But as I get older, I’ve think I just have a more realistic understanding of human nature and what motivates us. I just don’t think men and women want to be completely denied certain behaviours and roles in life. Not completely because if “equal” means “the same”, then yes, some inconsistencies may disappear, but it would be a very logical, stale existence in its place. I think this is the problem for the type of feminism often expressed on here. If you follow it to its logical conclusion, this doesn’t actually appeal to a lot of women.