Arguably because women have less agency in their lives and traditional ideas around female success or happiness are usually contingent on a man and/or children.
Yes, exactly this. And I'll admit, it does make me frustrated in part precisely because this kind of nonsense preys on a historic lack of female agency, and positions its female clientele as passive victims of a predestined Fate, as well as weak, credulous and Kinder, Kuche, Kirche-focused.
ElizabethMountbatten's story is horrible, and if anyone wants to see well-supported with court proceedings a version of the same thing which is even more morally disgusting, google Juliette D'Souza, the 'Hampstead Shaman'.
As well as conning a total of about £5 million out of gullible people, including claiming to be able to 'cure' a child with Down Syndrome, and staving off a client's terminal diagnosis, she took huge sums of money to 'help' a client with fertility difficulties get pregnant, then told her when she did that the baby was going to be born horribly deformed and that she needed to terminate this longed-for pregnancy. Which the poor, deluded client did.
Anyone who thinks that is harmless, or that D'Souza is a bad apple that reflects unfairly on all the 'genuine psychics' out there, should really engage their thinking gear.