NataliaOsipova - my beef is with the wording of the 2016 EU referendum. Were this referendum to have taken place in Switzerland, there would have been a booklet sent to everyone eligible to vote, outlining the pros and cons of both sides, with the possible outcome(s) explained from every point of view. You would then have had the option to vote "Yes", "No" OR "Don't Know". The "Leave" plan would not have been merely a lie on the back of a bus at the end of 40 years of anti-EU propaganda by Johnson, Farage and their ilk.
...whatever the pros and cons of using referenda in a parliamentary system, there can surely be no argument for having precisely one? If you support direct democracy you must surely, if only as a logical conclusion, support a people’s vote on May’s deal......? I'm not sure that Swiss referendums are advisory, though, I think once they are "won", they are put into law, but I could be wrong. Also, in the Swiss model, as long as you can get a certain number of signatories in support, if your proposition has not been accepted the first time, you can put it to the people time and again, I believe. But that is less likely to happen when everyone has been well-informed about the potential outcomes in the first place, unlike with Brexit where Leave had no plan.