Why not have the ONE reception? Why 2? Why not just have the one and be done with it? Of course people invite work colleagues, but WHY can't everyone go to the one reception? Like I said, where I am everyone goes to the one reception. There is not morning/afternoon and then evening. There is just the ceremony and then reception (which includes main meal, dessert, cake, speeches, drink and dancing - all at the one place). No one has yet to answer why it makes sense to have TWO receptions for the one wedding, when just one will suffice?
They usually come up with some guff that it's too expensive to have just the one reception with everyone and why should we pay for a meal for everyone blah blah blah. And now it used to be that evening guests were not expected to bring a gift but these days they get the same command to hand over money to pay for the couples' honeymoon as 'all day' guests.
We have started to decline a lot of wedding invites because the weddings are just so long. Hours and hours and hours. The ceremony is the shortest part and then there's just hours and hours.
Honestly enjoyed the one we went to where the B&G were Free Kirk of Scotland members. Ceremony, light lunch in the church hall straight after (plenty of food), then cake cutting, gave out slices to everyone and then it was all over. No 'fund our honeymoon with cash because we lived together' poems (although we did give them money) as a gift.
I think the other issue is outdated marriage laws in the UK (I love being British, but there's a lot of outdated elements here) so you can't legally marry after 6pm. So a lot of people opt for these boring lengthy weddings that drag on all day and night.