Other threads have got me thinking about this....
We all know that diagnosis of anxiety, depression, autism and other emotional/mental health/neurological conditions are on the rise.
My question is, is it true that we are just paying more attention to conditions that were swept under the rug, or are we over-diagnosing very natural human behaviour.
I've often thought depression, anxiety and other conditions are very natural reactions to our modern world.
Many people wake up early only to be overworked, fed bad food, underpaid, come home to more work, unable to foster connections with loved ones and children, feel lonely, cut off (no community), big uncertainty in the future, pollution, overpopulation, extinction of animals, little nature in some animals and a very aggressive media that seems to have an agenda - surely to feel bad is NORMAL in these circumstances.
I often think the diagnosis is a way of saying it's the PERSON who has the problem rather than the way we conduct our society/culture as a whole.
That is not to minimise that many conditions are the result of neurology and genetics, but a huge component is nurture and lifestyle.
I've often felt that we live in human zoos and are behaviour and neurosis stems from that.
For instance exercise is a natural anti-depressant but most of us don't get enough.
Anxiety is proven to be exaggerated by social media and the idea that everyone is doing better.
Is it that people individually are sicker, or is society sicker?
Curious for people's thoughts.