"We won’t be able to get certain foods like bananas or tomatoes but it’s not like we won’t be able to eat. And we’ll be leaving at a time when British produce is beginning to come into season so it’s the best possible time to leave with no deal."
This was said by a Conservative Leave-backing former cabinet minister.
So we've gone from being promised that the country would be better off after Brexit, no matter what kind of deal - remember May said that "No deal is better than a bad deal" to not being told that we will still be able to eat.
We should probably also keep in mind that we don't produce enough food in Britain to sustain the whole British population - so even if British produce is coming into season, there will not be enough for everyone in the UK.
And it would be a pity to forget what the Leave Alliance HQ tweeted in November 2017 - surely this is not what people voted for when they voted for Brexit:
"1. Except people did vote against the status quo and the current economic settlement. These places were already stagnating - so Brexit forces a lot of hard choices we have deferred for 2 decades. This might well be a positive."
"2. The country is peppered with slum towns long since devoid of a reason for being. The mining and steel jobs are never going to rerturn, so why are we perpetuating poverty by sustaining these places with welfare?"
"3. If Brexit then brings about some actual austerity, residents of these places will be forced into the cities, which of itself is beneficial - agglomoration creates increased market sizes in cities."
"When did affordable housing become a human right? Everybody who got anywhere had to rough it for a bit and make sacrifices. You don't improive your lot by rotting in Blackpool on the sick and waiting on a housing register."
"What people voted for was change. The public were told (ad nauseam) there would be major economic consequences - yet voted to leave anyway. So now, as voting adults, they will experience adult consequences."
"It is not a given that sleeping on the streets is the only imaginable outcome. There are market based options - and the market will adapt when you remove the articifial floor price."
As seem above, it's not just remainers who are negative about Brexit - it's the people who campaigned for Brexit, and people who voted for Brexit should realise this, rather than state that we are just negative and scaremongering.
As mentioned earlier, Rees-Mogg has stated it will take 50 years before we will see any benefits of Brexit.
Lord Digby Jones said: "I think Britain in 100 years’ time will thank God they came out."
And Farage has said: "I never said it would be a beneficial thing to leave and everyone would be better off, just that we would be self-governing.”
So again, what are the tangible benefits of Brexit?
Even the Brexit campaigners can't seem to mention any - other than of course learning that if you vote for major economic consequences despite being warned, you will have to deal with the consequences.